head to head · open source

copyparty vs rustypaste

copyparty has 46,907 GitHub stars, 1,904 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rustypaste has 1,211 stars, 90 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 3,773% (46,907 vs 1,211 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; rustypaste is written in Rust under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, rustypaste 7%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (file-sharing, file-upload-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K rustypaste ★ 1.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty rustypaste
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 1.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-10-03 2026-09-29
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 90
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick rustypaste if

  • You want the rustypaste feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and rustypaste fits your workflow better

full rustypaste profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About rustypaste

Rustypaste is a minimal, self hosted file upload and pastebin service written in Rust, meant for individuals and small teams who want to share files and text over their own endpoint rather than through a third party paste site.

read the full rustypaste overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs copyparty localsend vs rclone localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs ranger copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or rustypaste more popular?

copyparty has 46,907 GitHub stars and rustypaste has 1,211. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and rustypaste free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and rustypaste under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and rustypaste?

copyparty is written in Python and rustypaste in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or rustypaste?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,907 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rustypaste if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.