head to head · open source

copyparty vs OxiCloud

copyparty has 46,732 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OxiCloud has 3,576 stars, 170 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty leads on adoption by 1,207% (46,732 vs 3,576 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; OxiCloud is written in Rust under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, OxiCloud 5%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K OxiCloud ★ 3.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty OxiCloud
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 3.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick OxiCloud if

  • You want the OxiCloud feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and OxiCloud fits your workflow better

full OxiCloud profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About OxiCloud

OxiCloud is a self hosted cloud storage suite written in Rust that gives self hosters, home labs, and small teams files, photos, calendars, and contacts in a single lightweight deployment, aimed at anyone who wants the useful parts of a cloud suite without the operational weight of a traditional PHP stack.

read the full OxiCloud overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop copyparty vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or OxiCloud more popular?

copyparty has 46,732 GitHub stars and OxiCloud has 3,576. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and OxiCloud free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and OxiCloud under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and OxiCloud?

copyparty is written in Python and OxiCloud in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or OxiCloud?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,732 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OxiCloud if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.