head to head · open source
copyparty vs ffsend
copyparty has 46,732 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ffsend has 7,413 stars, 205 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 530% (46,732 vs 7,413 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; ffsend is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, ffsend 3%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | ffsend | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 7.4K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2025-11-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 205 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ffsend if
- You want the ffsend feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and ffsend fits your workflow better
About copyparty
copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.
read the full copyparty overview →
About ffsend
ffsend is a command line client for the Send file sharing service that uploads and downloads encrypted files and directories through a single terminal command, built for developers, system administrators and anyone who prefers a scriptable, privacy respecting alternative to a web upload form.
read the full ffsend overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or ffsend more popular?
copyparty has 46,732 GitHub stars and ffsend has 7,413. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and ffsend free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and ffsend under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and ffsend?
copyparty is written in Python and ffsend in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or ffsend?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,732 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ffsend if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.