head to head · open source
copyparty vs ffsend
copyparty has 47,235 GitHub stars, 1,918 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. ffsend has 7,423 stars, 206 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 12 months ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 536% (47,235 vs 7,423 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; ffsend is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, ffsend 3%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | ffsend | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 7.4K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2025-11-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 206 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ffsend if
- You want the ffsend feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and ffsend fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About ffsend
[![Build status on GitLab CI][gitlab ci master badge]][gitlab ci link] [![Newest release on crates.io][crate version badge]][crate link] [![Project license][crate license badge]](LICENSE) [crate license badge]: [crate link]: [crate version badge]: [gitlab ci link]: [gitlab ci master badge]: Notice: the default Send host is provided by [@timvisee][timvisee] (info). Please consider to [donate] and help keep it running. ffsend Easily and securely share files from the command line. A [Send][send] client. Easily and securely share files and directories from the command line through a safe, private and encrypted link…
read the full ffsend overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or ffsend more popular?
copyparty has 47,235 GitHub stars and ffsend has 7,423. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and ffsend free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and ffsend under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and ffsend?
copyparty is written in Python and ffsend in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or ffsend?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,235 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ffsend if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.