head to head · open source
copyparty vs dufs
copyparty has 47,235 GitHub stars, 1,918 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. dufs has 11,021 stars, 615 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 329% (47,235 vs 11,021 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; dufs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, dufs 6%. dufs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (file-sharing, file-upload-server, webdav-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | dufs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 11K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 615 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick dufs if
- You want the dufs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and dufs fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About dufs
Dufs Dufs is a distinctive utility file server that supports static serving, uploading, searching, accessing control, webdav... Features Serve static files Download folder as zip file Upload files and folders (Drag & Drop) Create/Edit/Search files Resumable/partial uploads/downloads Access control Support https Support webdav Easy to use with curl Install With cargo With docker With Homebrew Binaries on macOS, Linux, Windows Download from Github Releases, unzip and add dufs to your $PATH. CLI Examples Serve current working directory in read only mode Allow all operations like upload/delete/search/create/edit…
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or dufs more popular?
copyparty has 47,235 GitHub stars and dufs has 11,021. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and dufs free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and dufs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and dufs?
copyparty is written in Python and dufs in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or dufs?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,235 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dufs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.