head to head · open source

copyparty vs doublecmd

copyparty has 46,784 GitHub stars, 1,904 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. doublecmd has 4,564 stars, 356 forks, 634 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty leads on adoption by 925% (46,784 vs 4,564 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; doublecmd is written in Pascal under GPL-2.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, doublecmd 8%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K doublecmd ★ 4.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty doublecmd
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 4.6K
License MIT GPL-2.0
Written in Python Pascal
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 356
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick doublecmd if

  • You want the doublecmd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Pascal
  • You evaluated both and doublecmd fits your workflow better

full doublecmd profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About doublecmd

Double Commander is a free, cross platform, open source file manager that shows two panels side by side (or one above the other), and it is aimed at desktop users who want a twin pane file manager they can inspect and run without paying for a licence.

read the full doublecmd overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs copyparty localsend vs rclone localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs ranger copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or doublecmd more popular?

copyparty has 46,784 GitHub stars and doublecmd has 4,564. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and doublecmd free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and doublecmd under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and doublecmd?

copyparty is written in Python and doublecmd in Pascal. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or doublecmd?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,784 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose doublecmd if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.