head to head · open source
copyparty vs cyberduck
copyparty has 47,235 GitHub stars, 1,918 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. cyberduck has 4,892 stars, 385 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty leads on adoption by 866% (47,235 vs 4,892 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, cyberduck 8%. cyberduck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | cyberduck | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 4.9K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 385 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick cyberduck if
- You want the cyberduck feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and cyberduck fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About cyberduck
Cyberduck This is the development home for Cyberduck, a libre file transfer client for macOS and Windows. Command line interface (CLI) for Linux, macOS and Windows. The core libraries are used in Mountain Duck. Mailing Lists There is a Google Groups Cyberduck discussion mailing list. The following additional mailing lists are hosted: News Announcements of new releases Localization Notifications about changes to the translations needed Source Source code is available licensed under the GNU General Public License Version 3. Pull requests welcome! Localizations Translations to new languages are welcome. We use…
read the full cyberduck overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or cyberduck more popular?
copyparty has 47,235 GitHub stars and cyberduck has 4,892. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and cyberduck free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and cyberduck under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and cyberduck?
copyparty is written in Python and cyberduck in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or cyberduck?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,235 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cyberduck if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.