head to head · open source

copyparty vs 3105

copyparty has 46,974 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. 3105 has 871 stars, 150 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 27 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 5,293% (46,974 vs 871 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; 3105 is written in Swift under GPL-3.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, 3105 17%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K 3105 ★ 871 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty 3105
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 871
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python Swift
Last push 2026-10-09 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 150
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick 3105 if

  • You want the 3105 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and 3105 fits your workflow better

full 3105 profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About 3105

3105 is a native iOS app for browsing app data, managing portable patches, installing dialer themes and PosterBoard wallpapers, and cleaning limited device content, aimed at people who manage their own devices and want control over the data installed on them.

read the full 3105 overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 94K OBS Studio ★ 77K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs copyparty localsend vs rclone localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs uppy copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs ranger copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or 3105 more popular?

copyparty has 46,974 GitHub stars and 3105 has 871. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and 3105 free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and 3105 under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and 3105?

copyparty is written in Python and 3105 in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or 3105?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,974 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose 3105 if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.