head to head · open source
codegraph vs Continue
codegraph has 71,514 GitHub stars, 4,598 forks, 526 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Continue has 35,958 stars, 5,404 forks, 951 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph leads on adoption by 99% (71,514 vs 35,958 stars). codegraph is written in C under MIT; Continue is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. codegraph has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Continue 15%. Continue was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codegraph | Continue | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 72K | ★ 36K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | C | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.6K | ⑂ 5.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codegraph if
- You weight community size — 72K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Continue if
- You want the Continue feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Continue fits your workflow better
About codegraph
CodeGraph is a pre indexed code knowledge graph that runs locally and wires into AI coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and Hermes Agent — so those agents query a semantic map of the codebase instead of reading files one at a time.
read the full codegraph overview →
About Continue
Continue is an open source coding agent designed to assist developers directly within their IDE or terminal. It operates as a CLI tool, VS Code extension, and JetBrains plugin, enabling natural language interaction with codebases to generate, edit, and explain code. The project lives in the AI assisted developer tools ecosystem and is built with TypeScript under the Apache 2.0 license.
read the full Continue overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More AI Assisted Coding projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codegraph or Continue more popular?
codegraph has 71,514 GitHub stars and Continue has 35,958. codegraph has the larger community by that measure.
Are codegraph and Continue free?
Both are open source. codegraph is licensed under MIT and Continue under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between codegraph and Continue?
codegraph is written in C and Continue in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codegraph or Continue?
Choose codegraph if you want the larger community (71,514 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Continue if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.