head to head · open source

codegraph vs Grok Build

codegraph has 71,385 GitHub stars, 4,590 forks, 518 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Grok Build has 26,827 stars, 5,048 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. codegraph leads on adoption by 166% (71,385 vs 26,827 stars). codegraph is written in C under MIT; Grok Build is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. codegraph has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Grok Build 19%. Grok Build was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codegraph ★ 71K Grok Build ★ 27K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

codegraph Grok Build
GitHub stars ★ 71K ★ 27K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C Rust
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.6K ⑂ 5.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codegraph if

  • You weight community size — 71K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codegraph profile →

pick Grok Build if

  • You want the Grok Build feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Grok Build fits your workflow better

full Grok Build profile →

About codegraph

CodeGraph is a pre indexed code knowledge graph that runs locally and wires into AI coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and Hermes Agent — so those agents query a semantic map of the codebase instead of reading files one at a time.

read the full codegraph overview →

About Grok Build

Grok Build is a terminal based AI coding agent developed by SpaceXAI, distributed as the grok CLI/TUI. It operates as a fullscreen, mouse interactive interface that integrates with the user’s codebase to perform code editing, command execution, web search, and long running task orchestration. The project lives in the Rust ecosystem and is licensed under Apache 2.0.

read the full Grok Build overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

codegraph vs OpenCode codegraph vs pi codegraph vs OpenHands codegraph vs Paperclip codegraph vs rtk codegraph vs Orca codegraph vs Cline codegraph vs Aider codegraph vs Continue codegraph vs Tabby codegraph vs T3 Code codegraph vs Dyad

Frequently asked questions

Is codegraph or Grok Build more popular?

codegraph has 71,385 GitHub stars and Grok Build has 26,827. codegraph has the larger community by that measure.

Are codegraph and Grok Build free?

Both are open source. codegraph is licensed under MIT and Grok Build under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between codegraph and Grok Build?

codegraph is written in C and Grok Build in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codegraph or Grok Build?

Choose codegraph if you want the larger community (71,385 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Grok Build if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.