head to head · open source

compose vs munder-difflin

compose has 38,573 GitHub stars, 5,899 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. munder-difflin has 9,300 stars, 1,303 forks, 172 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 315% (38,573 vs 9,300 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; munder-difflin is written in JavaScript under MIT. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, munder-difflin 14%. munder-difflin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 39K munder-difflin ★ 9.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose munder-difflin
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 9.3K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.9K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick munder-difflin if

  • You want the munder-difflin feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and munder-difflin fits your workflow better

full munder-difflin profile →

About compose

Table of Contents Docker Compose Where to get Docker Compose + Windows and macOS + Linux Quick Start Contributing Legacy Docker Compose Docker Compose is a tool for running multi container applications on Docker defined using the Compose file format. A Compose file is used to define how one or more containers that make up your application are configured. Once you have a Compose file, you can create and start your application with a single command: docker compose up . Note : About Docker Swarm Docker Swarm used to rely on the legacy compose file format but did not adopt the compose specification so is missing…

read the full compose overview →

About munder-difflin

Munder Difflin Agent harness to run an office of your clones Free, open source and performant — a multi agent harness that works with the subscriptions you already pay for, on their hourly limits. It turns the terminal coding CLI you already run into a clone of you, one that keeps working while you're away and coordinates a whole office of agents on your own machine. Wraps Claude Code, Antigravity (Gemini), OpenAI Codex, xAI Grok , Kimi Code , Gemini CLI , Qwen , OpenCode , Crush , pi.dev , GitHub Copilot CLI , and Cursor — with bring your own keys and local LLMs. Agents that message, route, and remember…

read the full munder-difflin overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or munder-difflin more popular?

compose has 38,573 GitHub stars and munder-difflin has 9,300. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and munder-difflin free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and munder-difflin under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and munder-difflin?

compose is written in Go and munder-difflin in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or munder-difflin?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,573 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose munder-difflin if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.