head to head · open source

compose vs Healthchecks

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars, 5,817 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Healthchecks has 10,338 stars, 1,012 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. compose leads on adoption by 269% (38,175 vs 10,338 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Healthchecks is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Healthchecks 10%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K Healthchecks ★ 10K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose Healthchecks
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 10K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 1.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick Healthchecks if

  • You want the Healthchecks feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Healthchecks fits your workflow better

full Healthchecks profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About Healthchecks

Healthchecks is an open source cron job and background task monitoring service written in Python and Django. It lives in the Infrastructure and Operations ecosystem, in the orchestration and scheduling area, where teams need to know whether recurring jobs ran as expected. The service listens for HTTP requests and email messages, called pings, from cron jobs and scheduled tasks, called checks. When a ping does not arrive on time, Healthchecks sends alerts.

read the full Healthchecks overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or Healthchecks more popular?

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars and Healthchecks has 10,338. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and Healthchecks free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Healthchecks under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and Healthchecks?

compose is written in Go and Healthchecks in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or Healthchecks?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,175 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Healthchecks if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.