head to head · open source

compose vs devopness

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars, 5,818 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. devopness has 558 stars, 175 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 6,742% (38,178 vs 558 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; devopness is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, devopness 31%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K devopness ★ 558 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose devopness
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 558
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 175
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick devopness if

  • You want the devopness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and devopness fits your workflow better

full devopness profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About devopness

Stop managing DevOps. Ship more, stress less. DevOps Happiness for AI agents and humans. One platform · Any cloud · Any stack · Free plan Devopness Deploy apps and provision cloud infrastructure from scratch on AWS, Azure, GCP, DigitalOcean, and Hetzner: in accounts you control. One platform to replace many tools: Terraform + Ansible + Jenkins + PaaS (Vercel, Heroku, etc), and stack specific server panels. Manage apps, Linux servers, and cloud infrastructure from anywhere: web, mobile, API, or natural language in your AI agent through MCP. No SSH or cloud console for routine work. Create free account · Docs · Dis…

read the full devopness overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or devopness more popular?

compose has 38,178 GitHub stars and devopness has 558. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and devopness free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and devopness under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and devopness?

compose is written in Go and devopness in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or devopness?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,178 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose devopness if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.