head to head · open source

compose vs devopness

compose has 38,573 GitHub stars, 5,899 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. devopness has 573 stars, 181 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 6,632% (38,573 vs 573 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; devopness is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, devopness 32%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 39K devopness ★ 573 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose devopness
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 573
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.9K ⑂ 181
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick devopness if

  • You want the devopness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and devopness fits your workflow better

full devopness profile →

About compose

Table of Contents Docker Compose Where to get Docker Compose + Windows and macOS + Linux Quick Start Contributing Legacy Docker Compose Docker Compose is a tool for running multi container applications on Docker defined using the Compose file format. A Compose file is used to define how one or more containers that make up your application are configured. Once you have a Compose file, you can create and start your application with a single command: docker compose up . Note : About Docker Swarm Docker Swarm used to rely on the legacy compose file format but did not adopt the compose specification so is missing…

read the full compose overview →

About devopness

Stop managing DevOps. Ship more, stress less. DevOps Happiness for AI agents and humans. One platform · Any cloud · Any stack · Free plan Devopness Deploy apps and provision cloud infrastructure from scratch on AWS, Azure, GCP, DigitalOcean, and Hetzner: in accounts you control. One platform to replace many tools: Terraform + Ansible + Jenkins + PaaS (Vercel, Heroku, etc), and stack specific server panels. Manage apps, Linux servers, and cloud infrastructure from anywhere: web, mobile, API, or natural language in your AI agent through MCP. No SSH or cloud console for routine work. Create free account · Docs ·…

read the full devopness overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or devopness more popular?

compose has 38,573 GitHub stars and devopness has 573. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and devopness free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and devopness under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and devopness?

compose is written in Go and devopness in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or devopness?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,573 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose devopness if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.