head to head · open source
codegraph vs Paseo
codegraph has 76,235 GitHub stars, 5,066 forks, 233 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Paseo has 22,824 stars, 2,796 forks, 677 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph leads on adoption by 234% (76,235 vs 22,824 stars). codegraph is written in TypeScript under MIT; Paseo is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. codegraph has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Paseo 12%. Paseo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| codegraph | Paseo | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 76K | ★ 23K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 2.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick codegraph if
- You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Paseo if
- You want the Paseo feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Paseo fits your workflow better
About codegraph
CodeGraph Already installed? Run codegraph upgrade Follow @getcodegraph on X for updates. Supercharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes Agent, Gemini, Antigravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and more with Semantic Code Intelligence The fastest complete code graph · surgical context · built for how agents actually work · 100% local Kernel powered by Rust Documentation & Website → The CodeGraph platform is coming — for every PR, know exactly what to test, what could break, which flows are affected, and whether business logic is compromised. Get early beta access to the hosted product · getcodegraph.com…
read the full codegraph overview →
About Paseo
Paseo English · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 One interface for Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, OpenCode, and Pi agents. Run agents in parallel on your own machines. Ship from your phone or your desk. Self hosted: Agents run on your machine with your full dev environment. Use your tools, your configs, and your skills. Multi provider: Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, OpenCode, and Pi through the same interface. Pick the right model for each job. Voice control: Dictate tasks or talk through problems in voice mode. Hands free when you need it. Cross device: iOS, Android, desktop, web, and CLI. Start work at your desk, check in from…
read the full Paseo overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More AI Assisted Coding projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.
Frequently asked questions
Is codegraph or Paseo more popular?
codegraph has 76,235 GitHub stars and Paseo has 22,824. codegraph has the larger community by that measure.
Are codegraph and Paseo free?
Both are open source. codegraph is licensed under MIT, and Paseo has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between codegraph and Paseo?
codegraph is written in TypeScript and Paseo in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, codegraph or Paseo?
Choose codegraph if you want the larger community (76,235 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Paseo if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.