head to head · open source

NetData vs codeburn

NetData has 80,598 GitHub stars, 6,631 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped today. codeburn has 11,114 stars, 843 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped today. NetData leads on adoption by 625% (80,598 vs 11,114 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; codeburn is written in TypeScript under MIT. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, codeburn 8%. codeburn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K codeburn ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData codeburn
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 11K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 843
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick codeburn if

  • You want the codeburn feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and codeburn fits your workflow better

full codeburn profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About codeburn

CodeBurn is a free, open source, local first tool that tracks AI coding token usage and cost across 41 tools and agents, including Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, and Grok. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under MIT, and lives in the developer tools and observability ecosystem as a command line utility with optional desktop surfaces. Every surface reads the session files that the supported tools already write to disk, so CodeBurn acts as one source of truth rather than a separate collection layer.

read the full codeburn overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or codeburn more popular?

NetData has 80,598 GitHub stars and codeburn has 11,114. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and codeburn free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and codeburn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and codeburn?

NetData is written in Go and codeburn in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or codeburn?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,598 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose codeburn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.