head to head · open source

compose vs cloudstack

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars, 5,825 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cloudstack has 3,075 stars, 1,385 forks, 1,048 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 1,142% (38,195 vs 3,075 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; cloudstack is written in Java under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, cloudstack 45%. cloudstack was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (orchestration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K cloudstack ★ 3.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose cloudstack
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 3.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick cloudstack if

  • You want the cloudstack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and cloudstack fits your workflow better

full cloudstack profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About cloudstack

Apache CloudStack is an open source Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform, written primarily in Java and released under the Apache 2.0 licence, that deploys and manages large networks of virtual machines for service providers, enterprises, and operators who need a cloud they control.

read the full cloudstack overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs compose n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs ansible compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or cloudstack more popular?

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars and cloudstack has 3,075. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and cloudstack free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and cloudstack under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and cloudstack?

compose is written in Go and cloudstack in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or cloudstack?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,195 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose cloudstack if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.