head to head · open source
CloudFlare-ImgBed vs xiu
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars, 8,746 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. xiu has 2,338 stars, 239 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. CloudFlare-ImgBed leads on adoption by 193% (6,852 vs 2,338 stars). CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT; xiu is written in Rust under MIT. CloudFlare-ImgBed has attracted 128% as many forks as stars, xiu 10%. CloudFlare-ImgBed was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloudFlare-ImgBed | xiu | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.9K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 239 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if
- You weight community size — 6.9K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xiu if
- You want the xiu feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and xiu fits your workflow better
About CloudFlare-ImgBed
🗂️ Beyond image hosting: an all in one, open source file management hub. 简体中文 English Official Website [!IMPORTANT] If you encounter issues, please check the announcement first. Important notifications and non compatible updates will be explained in the announcement! 1. 💡 Introduction CloudFlare ImgBed is a self hosted image and file hosting solution for Docker and serverless environments, bringing Telegram , Discord , Cloudflare R2 , S3 compatible storage , Hugging Face , WebDAV , and more into one management interface. It provides file management, authentication, directory organization, content moderation, a…
read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →
About xiu
English Doc 中文文档 Sponsors We would like to thank the following sponsors for their support of this project. Recall.ai API for meeting recordings If you’re looking for a meeting recording API, consider checking out Recall.ai, an API that records Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, in person meetings, and more. Overview Xiu is a simple,high performance and secure live media server written in pure Rust, it now supports popular live protocols like RTMP[cluster]/RTSP/WebRTC[Whip/Whep]/HLS/HTTP FLV. Features [x] Support multiple platforms(Linux/MacOS/Windows). [x] Support RTMP. [x] Support publishing or subscribing…
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloudFlare-ImgBed or xiu more popular?
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars and xiu has 2,338. CloudFlare-ImgBed has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloudFlare-ImgBed and xiu free?
Both are open source. CloudFlare-ImgBed is licensed under MIT and xiu under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloudFlare-ImgBed and xiu?
CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript and xiu in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloudFlare-ImgBed or xiu?
Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if you want the larger community (6,852 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xiu if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.