head to head · open source
CloudFlare-ImgBed vs UniversalMediaServer
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars, 8,746 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. UniversalMediaServer has 2,668 stars, 526 forks, 405 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CloudFlare-ImgBed leads on adoption by 157% (6,852 vs 2,668 stars). CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT; UniversalMediaServer is written in Java under GPL-2.0. CloudFlare-ImgBed has attracted 128% as many forks as stars, UniversalMediaServer 20%. UniversalMediaServer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloudFlare-ImgBed | UniversalMediaServer | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.9K | ★ 2.7K |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 526 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if
- You weight community size — 6.9K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick UniversalMediaServer if
- You want the UniversalMediaServer feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and UniversalMediaServer fits your workflow better
About CloudFlare-ImgBed
🗂️ Beyond image hosting: an all in one, open source file management hub. 简体中文 English Official Website [!IMPORTANT] If you encounter issues, please check the announcement first. Important notifications and non compatible updates will be explained in the announcement! 1. 💡 Introduction CloudFlare ImgBed is a self hosted image and file hosting solution for Docker and serverless environments, bringing Telegram , Discord , Cloudflare R2 , S3 compatible storage , Hugging Face , WebDAV , and more into one management interface. It provides file management, authentication, directory organization, content moderation, a…
read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →
About UniversalMediaServer
Universal Media Server [ ][1] Universal Media Server is a DLNA, UPnP and HTTP/S Media Server. It is capable of sharing video, audio and images between most modern devices. It was originally based on PS3 Media Server by shagrath, in order to ensure greater stability and file compatibility. Universal Media Server supports all major operating systems, with versions for Windows, Linux and macOS. The program streams or transcodes many different media formats with little or no configuration. It is powered by [FFmpeg][27], [MediaInfo][28], [Crowdin][29], [MEncoder][26], tsMuxeR, AviSynth, VLC, and more, which combine…
read the full UniversalMediaServer overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloudFlare-ImgBed or UniversalMediaServer more popular?
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars and UniversalMediaServer has 2,668. CloudFlare-ImgBed has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloudFlare-ImgBed and UniversalMediaServer free?
Both are open source. CloudFlare-ImgBed is licensed under MIT and UniversalMediaServer under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloudFlare-ImgBed and UniversalMediaServer?
CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript and UniversalMediaServer in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloudFlare-ImgBed or UniversalMediaServer?
Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if you want the larger community (6,852 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose UniversalMediaServer if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.