head to head · open source
CloudFlare-ImgBed vs Openinary
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars, 8,746 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Openinary has 424 stars, 59 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. CloudFlare-ImgBed leads on adoption by 1,516% (6,852 vs 424 stars). CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript under MIT; Openinary is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. CloudFlare-ImgBed has attracted 128% as many forks as stars, Openinary 14%. CloudFlare-ImgBed was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cloudflare-r2, media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CloudFlare-ImgBed | Openinary | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.9K | ★ 424 |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-10-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.7K | ⑂ 59 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CloudFlare-ImgBed if
- You weight community size — 6.9K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Openinary if
- You want the Openinary feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Openinary fits your workflow better
About CloudFlare-ImgBed
🗂️ Beyond image hosting: an all in one, open source file management hub. 简体中文 English Official Website [!IMPORTANT] If you encounter issues, please check the announcement first. Important notifications and non compatible updates will be explained in the announcement! 1. 💡 Introduction CloudFlare ImgBed is a self hosted image and file hosting solution for Docker and serverless environments, bringing Telegram , Discord , Cloudflare R2 , S3 compatible storage , Hugging Face , WebDAV , and more into one management interface. It provides file management, authentication, directory organization, content moderation, a…
read the full CloudFlare-ImgBed overview →
About Openinary
Openinary is an open source, self hosted media processing platform that includes: on the fly transformations for images and videos via URL built in S3 compatible storage with automatic caching smart optimization with WebP, AVIF, and modern codecs simple REST API with URL based transformations convenient admin dashboard for asset management For documentation and more examples, please visit [!TIP] ☁️ Openinary Cloud is in public alpha. Same engine, hosted for you. Sign up and start on the free plan, no card required. Try it → [!WARNING] Please keep in mind that Openinary is still under active development and…
read the full Openinary overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CloudFlare-ImgBed or Openinary more popular?
CloudFlare-ImgBed has 6,852 GitHub stars and Openinary has 424. CloudFlare-ImgBed has the larger community by that measure.
Are CloudFlare-ImgBed and Openinary free?
Both are open source. CloudFlare-ImgBed is licensed under MIT and Openinary under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CloudFlare-ImgBed and Openinary?
CloudFlare-ImgBed is written in JavaScript and Openinary in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CloudFlare-ImgBed or Openinary?
Choose CloudFlare-ImgBed if you want the larger community (6,852 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Openinary if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.