head to head · open source

Chroma vs hue

Chroma has 29,333 GitHub stars, 2,522 forks, 843 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. hue has 1,411 stars, 412 forks, 32 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Chroma leads on adoption by 1,979% (29,333 vs 1,411 stars). Chroma is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; hue is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. Chroma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, hue 29%. Chroma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Chroma ★ 29K hue ★ 1.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Chroma hue
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 1.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 412
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Chroma if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Chroma profile →

pick hue if

  • You want the hue feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and hue fits your workflow better

full hue profile →

About Chroma

Chroma is an open source vector database designed to store, index, and retrieve embeddings for AI applications. It runs as a local Python or JavaScript client or in client server mode, providing a lightweight infrastructure layer for AI search and retrieval workloads. Built in Rust and licensed under Apache 2.0, it targets developers building RAG, agents, and other embedding dependent systems.

read the full Chroma overview →

About hue

Hue is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed SQL Assistant service for databases and data warehouses, built for data analysts, data engineers, and platform teams that need a shared, browser based way to query and explore data instead of installing a separate client for every engine.

read the full hue overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Chroma vs mall Chroma vs Prometheus Chroma vs NocoDB Chroma vs etcd Chroma vs DBeaver Chroma vs orm Chroma vs Milvus Chroma vs TiDB Chroma vs drawDB Chroma vs typeorm Chroma vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager Chroma vs Qdrant

Frequently asked questions

Is Chroma or hue more popular?

Chroma has 29,333 GitHub stars and hue has 1,411. Chroma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Chroma and hue free?

Both are open source. Chroma is licensed under Apache-2.0 and hue under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Chroma and hue?

Chroma is written in Rust and hue in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Chroma or hue?

Choose Chroma if you want the larger community (29,333 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose hue if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.