head to head · open source

orm vs Chroma

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars, 2,538 forks, 2,627 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Chroma has 29,333 stars, 2,522 forks, 843 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. orm leads on adoption by 62% (47,640 vs 29,333 stars). orm is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Chroma is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. orm has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Chroma 9%. Chroma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

orm ★ 48K Chroma ★ 29K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

orm Chroma
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 29K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 2.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick orm if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full orm profile →

pick Chroma if

  • You want the Chroma feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Chroma fits your workflow better

full Chroma profile →

About orm

Prisma ORM is a next generation TypeScript ORM for Node.js and TypeScript applications, supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB, and CockroachDB, and it is aimed at developers and teams building data backed applications in that ecosystem.

read the full orm overview →

About Chroma

Chroma is an open source vector database designed to store, index, and retrieve embeddings for AI applications. It runs as a local Python or JavaScript client or in client server mode, providing a lightweight infrastructure layer for AI search and retrieval workloads. Built in Rust and licensed under Apache 2.0, it targets developers building RAG, agents, and other embedding dependent systems.

read the full Chroma overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs orm supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

orm vs mall orm vs Prometheus orm vs NocoDB orm vs etcd orm vs DBeaver orm vs Milvus orm vs TiDB orm vs drawDB orm vs typeorm orm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager orm vs Qdrant orm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is orm or Chroma more popular?

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars and Chroma has 29,333. orm has the larger community by that measure.

Are orm and Chroma free?

Both are open source. orm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Chroma under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between orm and Chroma?

orm is written in TypeScript and Chroma in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, orm or Chroma?

Choose orm if you want the larger community (47,640 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Chroma if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.