head to head · open source
Chaskiq vs bytedesk
Chaskiq has 3,584 GitHub stars, 510 forks, 82 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. bytedesk has 539 stars, 145 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Chaskiq leads on adoption by 565% (3,584 vs 539 stars). Chaskiq is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; bytedesk is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. Chaskiq has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, bytedesk 27%. bytedesk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (chatbot, helpdesk, livechat), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Chaskiq | bytedesk | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 3.6K | ★ 539 |
| License | Custom / other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-06-30 | 2026-11-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 510 | ⑂ 145 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Chaskiq if
- You weight community size — 3.6K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick bytedesk if
- You want the bytedesk feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and bytedesk fits your workflow better
About Chaskiq
Chaskiq Free & Source Available Messaging Platform for Marketing, Support & Sales The front line of your customer service. Main features: Customer Segment Filters with custom attributes support Web Messenger embed Agent's conversation routing Text chat with customizable content blocks support Video Calls ! Triggerable conversational bots Mailing campaigns Onboarding tours API integrations Whatsapp / Twitter DM / Slack / Calendly / Zoom and more! CRM integration Pipedrive supported Webhooks Help Center system with multilanguage support API support consumable via GrapqhQL with Oauth authorization Quick replies (as…
read the full Chaskiq overview →
About bytedesk
Bytedesk Chat as a Service AI powered Omnichannel customer service With Team IM Language: English 中文 Demo Admin Dashboard Admin Chat Admin LLM+Agent Admin Channel Agent Introduction TeamIM Multi level organizational structure Role management Permission management ... Customer Service Support multiple channels multiple routing strategies, and detailed assessment indicators Seating workbench ... Knowledge Base Internal Docs HelpCenter FAQ Ticket Ticket management Ticket SLA management Ticket statistics and reports ... AI Agent Chat with Ollama/DeepSeek/ZhipuAI/... Chat with Knowledge base(RAG) Function calling Mcp…
read the full bytedesk overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Customer Support & Success projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Customer Support & Success field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Chaskiq or bytedesk more popular?
Chaskiq has 3,584 GitHub stars and bytedesk has 539. Chaskiq has the larger community by that measure.
Are Chaskiq and bytedesk free?
Both are open source. Chaskiq has no licence declared in this registry, and bytedesk is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Chaskiq and bytedesk?
Chaskiq is written in TypeScript and bytedesk in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Chaskiq or bytedesk?
Choose Chaskiq if you want the larger community (3,584 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose bytedesk if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.