head to head · open source

Cal.com vs appointment

Cal.com has 48,529 GitHub stars, 15,154 forks, 1,432 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. appointment has 552 stars, 29 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Cal.com leads on adoption by 8,691% (48,529 vs 552 stars). Cal.com is written in TypeScript under MIT; appointment is written in Python under MPL-2.0. Cal.com has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, appointment 5%. appointment was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cal.com ★ 49K appointment ★ 552 category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cal.com appointment
GitHub stars ★ 49K ★ 552
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 29
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cal.com if

  • You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cal.com profile →

pick appointment if

  • You want the appointment feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and appointment fits your workflow better

full appointment profile →

About Cal.com

Cal.diy is a fully open source, community maintained fork of Cal.com, stripped of all enterprise and commercial features. It provides a self hosted scheduling platform built on the T3 stack (Next.js, tRPC, Prisma, Tailwind CSS, Zod), licensed under MIT with no proprietary code or license keys required.

read the full Cal.com overview →

About appointment

Thunderbird Appointment is a self hostable, MPL 2.0 licensed scheduling application from the Thunderbird project that lets someone publish their availability and invite others to book open times on their calendar, and it is aimed at individuals, teams and organisations that want a booking link workflow running on infrastructure they control.

read the full appointment overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K duckdb ★ 41K

Related comparisons

cal-com vs luigi cal-com vs salt cal-com vs tone-js cal-com vs apscheduler cal-com vs rallly cal-com vs easy-appointments cal-com vs hi-events cal-com vs croner cal-com vs anki cal-com vs tutor cal-com vs mike plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor

More Scheduling & Event Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Scheduling & Event Management field.

Cal.com vs luigi Cal.com vs salt Cal.com vs Tone.js Cal.com vs apscheduler Cal.com vs Rallly Cal.com vs Easy!Appointments Cal.com vs Hi.Events Cal.com vs croner Cal.com vs brightbean-studio Cal.com vs Saturn Cal.com vs nexrender Cal.com vs laravel-totem

Frequently asked questions

Is Cal.com or appointment more popular?

Cal.com has 48,529 GitHub stars and appointment has 552. Cal.com has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cal.com and appointment free?

Both are open source. Cal.com is licensed under MIT and appointment under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Cal.com and appointment?

Cal.com is written in TypeScript and appointment in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cal.com or appointment?

Choose Cal.com if you want the larger community (48,529 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose appointment if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.