head to head · open source

Cal.com vs apscheduler

Cal.com has 48,529 GitHub stars, 15,154 forks, 1,432 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. apscheduler has 7,630 stars, 784 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. Cal.com leads on adoption by 536% (48,529 vs 7,630 stars). Cal.com is written in TypeScript under MIT; apscheduler is written in Python under MIT. Cal.com has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, apscheduler 10%. Cal.com was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cal.com ★ 49K apscheduler ★ 7.6K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cal.com apscheduler
GitHub stars ★ 49K ★ 7.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 784
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cal.com if

  • You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cal.com profile →

pick apscheduler if

  • You want the apscheduler feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and apscheduler fits your workflow better

full apscheduler profile →

About Cal.com

Cal.diy is a fully open source, community maintained fork of Cal.com, stripped of all enterprise and commercial features. It provides a self hosted scheduling platform built on the T3 stack (Next.js, tRPC, Prisma, Tailwind CSS, Zod), licensed under MIT with no proprietary code or license keys required.

read the full Cal.com overview →

About apscheduler

APScheduler is an MIT licensed Python library that provides task scheduling and job queuing, scaling from a single process script to multi node deployments that share a persistent data store.

read the full apscheduler overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K duckdb ★ 41K

Related comparisons

cal-com vs luigi cal-com vs salt cal-com vs tone-js cal-com vs rallly cal-com vs easy-appointments cal-com vs hi-events cal-com vs croner cal-com vs anki cal-com vs tutor cal-com vs mike plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor

More Scheduling & Event Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Scheduling & Event Management field.

Cal.com vs luigi Cal.com vs salt Cal.com vs Tone.js Cal.com vs Rallly Cal.com vs Easy!Appointments Cal.com vs Hi.Events Cal.com vs croner Cal.com vs brightbean-studio Cal.com vs Saturn Cal.com vs nexrender Cal.com vs laravel-totem Cal.com vs koordinator

Frequently asked questions

Is Cal.com or apscheduler more popular?

Cal.com has 48,529 GitHub stars and apscheduler has 7,630. Cal.com has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cal.com and apscheduler free?

Both are open source. Cal.com is licensed under MIT and apscheduler under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Cal.com and apscheduler?

Cal.com is written in TypeScript and apscheduler in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cal.com or apscheduler?

Choose Cal.com if you want the larger community (48,529 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose apscheduler if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.