head to head · open source

Cal.com vs Mike

Cal.com has 48,529 GitHub stars, 15,154 forks, 1,432 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Mike has 4,244 stars, 1,319 forks, 68 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cal.com leads on adoption by 1,043% (48,529 vs 4,244 stars). Cal.com is written in TypeScript under MIT; Mike is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Cal.com has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, Mike 31%. Mike was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cal.com ★ 49K Mike ★ 4.2K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cal.com Mike
GitHub stars ★ 49K ★ 4.2K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cal.com if

  • You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cal.com profile →

pick Mike if

  • You want the Mike feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Mike fits your workflow better

full Mike profile →

About Cal.com

Cal.diy is a fully open source, community maintained fork of Cal.com, stripped of all enterprise and commercial features. It provides a self hosted scheduling platform built on the T3 stack (Next.js, tRPC, Prisma, Tailwind CSS, Zod), licensed under MIT with no proprietary code or license keys required.

read the full Cal.com overview →

About Mike

Mike is an open source legal AI platform for document review, drafting, and legal research. It is built as a TypeScript application with a Next.js frontend, an Express backend, Supabase Auth and Postgres, and Cloudflare R2 compatible object storage. The project sits in the legal technology and business software ecosystem and uses the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0.

read the full Mike overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K duckdb ★ 41K

Related comparisons

cal-com vs luigi cal-com vs salt cal-com vs tone-js cal-com vs apscheduler cal-com vs rallly cal-com vs easy-appointments cal-com vs hi-events cal-com vs croner plane vs mike twenty vs mike odoo vs mike rocket-chat vs mike cal-com vs anki cal-com vs tutor plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki

More Scheduling & Event Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Scheduling & Event Management field.

Cal.com vs luigi Cal.com vs salt Cal.com vs Tone.js Cal.com vs apscheduler Cal.com vs Rallly Cal.com vs Easy!Appointments Cal.com vs Hi.Events Cal.com vs croner Cal.com vs brightbean-studio Cal.com vs Saturn Cal.com vs nexrender Cal.com vs laravel-totem

Frequently asked questions

Is Cal.com or Mike more popular?

Cal.com has 48,529 GitHub stars and Mike has 4,244. Cal.com has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cal.com and Mike free?

Both are open source. Cal.com is licensed under MIT and Mike under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Cal.com and Mike?

Cal.com is written in TypeScript and Mike in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cal.com or Mike?

Choose Cal.com if you want the larger community (48,529 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Mike if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.