head to head · open source

Cal.com vs tutor

Cal.com has 48,529 GitHub stars, 15,154 forks, 1,432 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. tutor has 1,125 stars, 510 forks, 55 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cal.com leads on adoption by 4,214% (48,529 vs 1,125 stars). Cal.com is written in TypeScript under MIT; tutor is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Cal.com has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, tutor 45%. tutor was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cal.com ★ 49K tutor ★ 1.1K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cal.com tutor
GitHub stars ★ 49K ★ 1.1K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 510
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cal.com if

  • You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cal.com profile →

pick tutor if

  • You want the tutor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and tutor fits your workflow better

full tutor profile →

About Cal.com

Cal.diy is a fully open source, community maintained fork of Cal.com, stripped of all enterprise and commercial features. It provides a self hosted scheduling platform built on the T3 stack (Next.js, tRPC, Prisma, Tailwind CSS, Zod), licensed under MIT with no proprietary code or license keys required.

read the full Cal.com overview →

About tutor

Tutor is the official Docker based distribution of Open edX, built for both production deployments and local development. It lives in the Open edX ecosystem, written in Python and licensed under the AGPL 3.0, and it carries the stated goal of making Open edX easy to deploy, customise, upgrade and scale. The project packages the platform as a set of Docker images managed through Docker Compose, with support for Kubernetes, plugins and a hosted AWS image.

read the full tutor overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K duckdb ★ 41K

Related comparisons

cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs luigi cal-com vs salt cal-com vs tone-js cal-com vs apscheduler cal-com vs rallly cal-com vs easy-appointments cal-com vs hi-events cal-com vs croner cal-com vs mike plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Scheduling & Event Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Scheduling & Event Management field.

Cal.com vs luigi Cal.com vs salt Cal.com vs Tone.js Cal.com vs apscheduler Cal.com vs Rallly Cal.com vs Easy!Appointments Cal.com vs Hi.Events Cal.com vs croner Cal.com vs brightbean-studio Cal.com vs Saturn Cal.com vs nexrender Cal.com vs laravel-totem

Frequently asked questions

Is Cal.com or tutor more popular?

Cal.com has 48,529 GitHub stars and tutor has 1,125. Cal.com has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cal.com and tutor free?

Both are open source. Cal.com is licensed under MIT and tutor under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Cal.com and tutor?

Cal.com is written in TypeScript and tutor in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cal.com or tutor?

Choose Cal.com if you want the larger community (48,529 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tutor if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.