head to head · open source
Cal.com vs brightbean-studio
Cal.com has 49,651 GitHub stars, 15,521 forks, 1,432 open issues and last shipped yesterday. brightbean-studio has 2,611 stars, 564 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Cal.com leads on adoption by 1,802% (49,651 vs 2,611 stars). Cal.com is written in TypeScript under MIT; brightbean-studio is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Cal.com has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, brightbean-studio 22%. Cal.com was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (open-source), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cal.com | brightbean-studio | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 2.6K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 16K | ⑂ 564 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cal.com if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick brightbean-studio if
- You want the brightbean-studio feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and brightbean-studio fits your workflow better
About Cal.com
[!WARNING] Use at your own risk. Cal.diy is the open source community edition of Cal.com and it is intended for users who want to self host their own Cal.diy instance. It is strictly recommended for personal, non production use. Please review all installation and configuration steps carefully. Self hosting requires advanced knowledge of server administration, database management, and securing sensitive data. Proceed only if you are comfortable with these responsibilities. [!TIP] For any commercial and enterprise ready scheduling infrastructure, use Cal.com, not Cal.diy; hosted by us or get invited to on prem…
read the full Cal.com overview →
About brightbean-studio
Open source social media management for creators, agencies, and SMBs. About BrightBean Studio BrightBean Studio is an open source, self hostable social media management platform built for creators, agencies and SMBs. It does what Sendible, SocialPilot, or ContentStudio do, but free and without per seat, per channel, or per workspace limits. Plan, compose, schedule, approve, publish, and monitor content across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok, YouTube, Pinterest, Threads, Bluesky, Google Business Profile, Mastodon, and DEV.to from a single multi workspace dashboard. It's for people managing many client…
read the full brightbean-studio overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Scheduling & Event Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Scheduling & Event Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cal.com or brightbean-studio more popular?
Cal.com has 49,651 GitHub stars and brightbean-studio has 2,611. Cal.com has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cal.com and brightbean-studio free?
Both are open source. Cal.com is licensed under MIT and brightbean-studio under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Cal.com and brightbean-studio?
Cal.com is written in TypeScript and brightbean-studio in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cal.com or brightbean-studio?
Choose Cal.com if you want the larger community (49,651 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose brightbean-studio if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.