head to head · open source

Cal.com vs Saturn

Cal.com has 48,529 GitHub stars, 15,154 forks, 1,432 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Saturn has 2,305 stars, 686 forks, 279 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. Cal.com leads on adoption by 2,005% (48,529 vs 2,305 stars). Cal.com is written in TypeScript under MIT; Saturn is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Cal.com has attracted 31% as many forks as stars, Saturn 30%. Cal.com was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Cal.com ★ 49K Saturn ★ 2.3K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Cal.com Saturn
GitHub stars ★ 49K ★ 2.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-14 2025-11-12
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 686
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Cal.com if

  • You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Cal.com profile →

pick Saturn if

  • You want the Saturn feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Saturn fits your workflow better

full Saturn profile →

About Cal.com

Cal.diy is a fully open source, community maintained fork of Cal.com, stripped of all enterprise and commercial features. It provides a self hosted scheduling platform built on the T3 stack (Next.js, tRPC, Prisma, Tailwind CSS, Zod), licensed under MIT with no proprietary code or license keys required.

read the full Cal.com overview →

About Saturn

Saturn is distributed job scheduling platform. Created by VIP.com. Java based. Apache 2.0 licensed. GitHub shows 2305 stars, 686 forks, last push 2025 11 12. It is listed under business software scheduling and event management. Repository age is 10 years. Lives in open source Java scheduling ecosystem. Provides fault tolerant and high available job scheduling service. Targets time based jobs across many machines.

read the full Saturn overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K duckdb ★ 41K

Related comparisons

cal-com vs luigi cal-com vs salt cal-com vs tone-js cal-com vs apscheduler cal-com vs rallly cal-com vs easy-appointments cal-com vs hi-events cal-com vs croner cal-com vs anki cal-com vs tutor cal-com vs mike plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor

More Scheduling & Event Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Scheduling & Event Management field.

Cal.com vs luigi Cal.com vs salt Cal.com vs Tone.js Cal.com vs apscheduler Cal.com vs Rallly Cal.com vs Easy!Appointments Cal.com vs Hi.Events Cal.com vs croner Cal.com vs brightbean-studio Cal.com vs nexrender Cal.com vs laravel-totem Cal.com vs koordinator

Frequently asked questions

Is Cal.com or Saturn more popular?

Cal.com has 48,529 GitHub stars and Saturn has 2,305. Cal.com has the larger community by that measure.

Are Cal.com and Saturn free?

Both are open source. Cal.com is licensed under MIT and Saturn under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Cal.com and Saturn?

Cal.com is written in TypeScript and Saturn in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Cal.com or Saturn?

Choose Cal.com if you want the larger community (48,529 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Saturn if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.