head to head · open source
caddy vs WR.DO
caddy has 78,660 GitHub stars, 5,232 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WR.DO has 2,291 stars, 363 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 3,333% (78,660 vs 2,291 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| caddy | WR.DO | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 79K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 363 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick caddy if
- You weight community size — 79K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WR.DO if
- You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better
About caddy
a project Every site on HTTPS Caddy is an extensible server platform that uses TLS by default. Releases · Documentation · Get Help Powered by Special thanks to: Warp, built for coding with multiple AI agents Available for MacOS, Linux, & Windows Menu Features Install Build from source For development With version information and/or plugins Quick start Overview Full documentation Getting help About Features Easy configuration with the Caddyfile Powerful configuration with its native JSON config Dynamic configuration with the JSON API Config adapters if you don't like JSON Automatic HTTPS by default ZeroSSL and…
read the full caddy overview →
About WR.DO
WR.DO 一站式域名服务平台，集成短链服务、临时邮箱、子域名管理、文件存储和开放API接口。 官方站点 · 部署文档 · 反馈讨论 · English 简体中文 🌟 推荐 Claude Code 稳定 API 渠道：nbility.dev ，支持 claude opus 4 6 等主流 AI Coding 大模型🥳 版本说明 开源版 Demo：likedo.vercel.app 运营版 LikeDo：like.do ，集成 AI Agent 统一调度管理站内资源，内置激励共创系统，点击使用邀请码注册 。 截图预览 功能列表 🔗 短链服务 [功能列表] 支持自定义短链 支持生成自定义二维码 支持密码保护链接 支持设置过期时间 支持访问统计（实时日志、地图等多维度数据分析） 支持调用 API 创建短链 📮 域名邮箱服务 [功能列表] 支持创建自定义前缀邮箱 支持过滤未读邮件列表 可创建无限数量邮箱 支持接收无限制邮件 （依赖 Cloudflare Email Worker） 支持发送邮件（依赖 Resend） 支持 Catch All 配置 支持 Telegram 推送（多频道/群组） 支持调用 API 创建邮箱 支持调用 API 获取收件箱邮件 🌐 子域名管理服务 [功能列表] 支持管理多 Cloudflare 账户下的多个域名的 DNS 记录 支持创建多种 DNS 记录类型（CNAME、A、TXT 等）…
read the full WR.DO overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is caddy or WR.DO more popular?
caddy has 78,660 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,291. caddy has the larger community by that measure.
Are caddy and WR.DO free?
Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WR.DO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between caddy and WR.DO?
caddy is written in Go and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, caddy or WR.DO?
Choose caddy if you want the larger community (78,660 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.