head to head · open source
caddy vs WR.DO
caddy has 75,840 GitHub stars, 4,970 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. WR.DO has 2,279 stars, 364 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 3,228% (75,840 vs 2,279 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| caddy | WR.DO | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 76K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.0K | ⑂ 364 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick caddy if
- You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WR.DO if
- You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better
About caddy
Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.
read the full caddy overview →
About WR.DO
WR.DO free open source MIT TypeScript Next.js self hosted one stop domain service platform. It combines short link generation, unlimited domain email, Cloudflare subdomain management, S3 compatible file storage, open API, admin panel. It targets operators needing one control plane for DNS records, links, mailboxes, files, users.
read the full WR.DO overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is caddy or WR.DO more popular?
caddy has 75,840 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,279. caddy has the larger community by that measure.
Are caddy and WR.DO free?
Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WR.DO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between caddy and WR.DO?
caddy is written in Go and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, caddy or WR.DO?
Choose caddy if you want the larger community (75,840 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.