head to head · open source

caddy vs wireguard-install

caddy has 78,819 GitHub stars, 5,235 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped today. wireguard-install has 3,222 stars, 510 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 2,346% (78,819 vs 3,222 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; wireguard-install is written in Shell under MIT. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, wireguard-install 16%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (privacy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 79K wireguard-install ★ 3.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy wireguard-install
GitHub stars ★ 79K ★ 3.2K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Shell
Last push 2026-11-06 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 510
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 79K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick wireguard-install if

  • You want the wireguard-install feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and wireguard-install fits your workflow better

full wireguard-install profile →

About caddy

a project Every site on HTTPS Caddy is an extensible server platform that uses TLS by default. Releases · Documentation · Get Help Powered by Special thanks to: Warp, built for coding with multiple AI agents Available for MacOS, Linux, & Windows Menu Features Install Build from source For development With version information and/or plugins Quick start Overview Full documentation Getting help About Features Easy configuration with the Caddyfile Powerful configuration with its native JSON config Dynamic configuration with the JSON API Config adapters if you don't like JSON Automatic HTTPS by default ZeroSSL and…

read the full caddy overview →

About wireguard-install

English 简体中文 繁體中文 Русский Video en Español WireGuard VPN Server Auto Setup Script WireGuard VPN server installer for Ubuntu, Debian, AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, CentOS, Fedora, openSUSE and Raspberry Pi OS. This script will let you set up your own VPN server in just a few minutes, even if you haven't used WireGuard before. WireGuard is a fast and modern VPN designed with the goals of ease of use and high performance. Features: Fully automated WireGuard VPN server setup, no user input needed Supports interactive install using custom options Generates VPN profiles to auto configure Windows, macOS, iOS and Android…

read the full wireguard-install overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or wireguard-install more popular?

caddy has 78,819 GitHub stars and wireguard-install has 3,222. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and wireguard-install free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and wireguard-install under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and wireguard-install?

caddy is written in Go and wireguard-install in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or wireguard-install?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (78,819 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose wireguard-install if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.