head to head · open source

caddy vs trickster

caddy has 76,688 GitHub stars, 5,050 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped today. trickster has 2,092 stars, 190 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. caddy leads on adoption by 3,566% (76,688 vs 2,092 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; trickster is written in Go under Apache-2.0. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, trickster 9%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 77K trickster ★ 2.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy trickster
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 2.1K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-10-04
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 190
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick trickster if

  • You want the trickster feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and trickster fits your workflow better

full trickster profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About trickster

Trickster is an open source Go HTTP reverse proxy cache and time series database query accelerator for operators who want faster dashboards and a hardened edge in front of HTTP services.

read the full trickster overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy caddy vs traefik frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs goproxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs cloudflared caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or trickster more popular?

caddy has 76,688 GitHub stars and trickster has 2,092. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and trickster free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and trickster under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and trickster?

caddy is written in Go and trickster in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or trickster?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (76,688 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose trickster if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.