head to head · open source

caddy vs tengine

caddy has 75,951 GitHub stars, 4,988 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tengine has 13,371 stars, 2,502 forks, 502 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 468% (75,951 vs 13,371 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; tengine is written in C under BSD-2-Clause. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, tengine 19%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (http3, reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K tengine ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy tengine
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-2-Clause
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 2.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick tengine if

  • You want the tengine feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and tengine fits your workflow better

full tengine profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About tengine

Tengine is a high performance, BSD 2 Clause licensed web server and reverse proxy that is 100% compatible with nginx, built for operators and platform teams that need HTTP/3, Kubernetes Ingress support, dynamic configuration and Chinese cryptographic standards without abandoning their existing nginx configuration.

read the full tengine overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy caddy vs traefik frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs goproxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs cloudflared caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or tengine more popular?

caddy has 75,951 GitHub stars and tengine has 13,371. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and tengine free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and tengine under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and tengine?

caddy is written in Go and tengine in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or tengine?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (75,951 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose tengine if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.