head to head · open source

caddy vs SoftEtherVPN

caddy has 75,847 GitHub stars, 4,970 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. SoftEtherVPN has 13,562 stars, 2,781 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 459% (75,847 vs 13,562 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; SoftEtherVPN is written in C under Apache-2.0. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, SoftEtherVPN 21%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K SoftEtherVPN ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy SoftEtherVPN
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick SoftEtherVPN if

  • You want the SoftEtherVPN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and SoftEtherVPN fits your workflow better

full SoftEtherVPN profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About SoftEtherVPN

SoftEther VPN is an open source, cross platform, multi protocol VPN server and client, written in C and licensed under Apache 2.0, intended for administrators and self hosters who need one program to serve many VPN protocols instead of running several separate daemons.

read the full SoftEtherVPN overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns caddy vs sliver caddy vs smartdns

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or SoftEtherVPN more popular?

caddy has 75,847 GitHub stars and SoftEtherVPN has 13,562. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and SoftEtherVPN free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SoftEtherVPN under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and SoftEtherVPN?

caddy is written in Go and SoftEtherVPN in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or SoftEtherVPN?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (75,847 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SoftEtherVPN if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.