head to head · open source

caddy vs reproxy

caddy has 77,986 GitHub stars, 5,143 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped yesterday. reproxy has 1,309 stars, 96 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. caddy leads on adoption by 5,858% (77,986 vs 1,309 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; reproxy is written in Go under MIT. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, reproxy 7%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 78K reproxy ★ 1.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy reproxy
GitHub stars ★ 78K ★ 1.3K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-10-14 2026-09-06
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 96
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick reproxy if

  • You want the reproxy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and reproxy fits your workflow better

full reproxy profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About reproxy

Reproxy is a small, MIT licensed edge HTTP and HTTPS server that works as a reverse proxy, built for developers and operators who want to route traffic to Docker containers, Consul services, static rules, or files from a single binary or container instead of maintaining a larger ingress stack.

read the full reproxy overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or reproxy more popular?

caddy has 77,986 GitHub stars and reproxy has 1,309. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and reproxy free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and reproxy under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and reproxy?

caddy is written in Go and reproxy in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or reproxy?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (77,986 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose reproxy if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.