head to head · open source

caddy vs node-dns

caddy has 77,398 GitHub stars, 5,091 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. node-dns has 591 stars, 80 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. caddy leads on adoption by 12,996% (77,398 vs 591 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; node-dns is written in JavaScript under MIT. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, node-dns 14%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 77K node-dns ★ 591 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy node-dns
GitHub stars ★ 77K ★ 591
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-07-26
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 80
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 77K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick node-dns if

  • You want the node-dns feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and node-dns fits your workflow better

full node-dns profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About node-dns

node dns is a DNS server and client library in pure JavaScript with no dependencies, published on npm as dns2 , for Node.js developers who need to resolve or serve DNS records programmatically.

read the full node-dns overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy caddy vs traefik frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs goproxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs cloudflared caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or node-dns more popular?

caddy has 77,398 GitHub stars and node-dns has 591. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and node-dns free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and node-dns under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and node-dns?

caddy is written in Go and node-dns in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or node-dns?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (77,398 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose node-dns if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.