head to head · open source

caddy vs node

caddy has 76,036 GitHub stars, 4,994 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. node has 1,354 stars, 355 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 5,516% (76,036 vs 1,354 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; node is written in Go under GPL-3.0. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, node 26%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K node ★ 1.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy node
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 1.4K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 355
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick node if

  • You want the node feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and node fits your workflow better

full node profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About node

Mysterium Node is the official Go implementation of the Mysterium Network distributed VPN (dVPN) protocol, a cross platform package for operators who want to run a node on that network and for developers who want to build clients against it.

read the full node overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy caddy vs traefik frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs goproxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs cloudflared caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or node more popular?

caddy has 76,036 GitHub stars and node has 1,354. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and node free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and node under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and node?

caddy is written in Go and node in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or node?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (76,036 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose node if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.