head to head · open source

caddy vs MasterDnsVPN

caddy has 75,868 GitHub stars, 4,976 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped yesterday. MasterDnsVPN has 7,036 stars, 799 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 978% (75,868 vs 7,036 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; MasterDnsVPN is written in Go under MIT. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, MasterDnsVPN 11%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K MasterDnsVPN ★ 7.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy MasterDnsVPN
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 7.0K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 799
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick MasterDnsVPN if

  • You want the MasterDnsVPN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and MasterDnsVPN fits your workflow better

full MasterDnsVPN profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About MasterDnsVPN

MasterDnsVPN is a Go based DNS tunneling VPN that carries TCP traffic inside DNS queries and responses, built for censorship bypass in networks where normal VPN transports are blocked, and aimed at self hosters, researchers and users in heavily filtered environments.

read the full MasterDnsVPN overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs goproxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns caddy vs SoftEtherVPN

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or MasterDnsVPN more popular?

caddy has 75,868 GitHub stars and MasterDnsVPN has 7,036. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and MasterDnsVPN free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MasterDnsVPN under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and MasterDnsVPN?

caddy is written in Go and MasterDnsVPN in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or MasterDnsVPN?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (75,868 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose MasterDnsVPN if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.