head to head · open source

caddy vs goshs

caddy has 76,201 GitHub stars, 5,023 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped yesterday. goshs has 987 stars, 58 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 7,620% (76,201 vs 987 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; goshs is written in Go under MIT. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, goshs 6%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (golang, http-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K goshs ★ 987 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy goshs
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 987
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 58
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick goshs if

  • You want the goshs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and goshs fits your workflow better

full goshs profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About goshs

goshs is a single binary file server written in Go for red teamers, CTF players, and developers who need more capability than python3 m http.server without configuring Apache.

read the full goshs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy caddy vs traefik frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs goproxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs cloudflared caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or goshs more popular?

caddy has 76,201 GitHub stars and goshs has 987. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and goshs free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and goshs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and goshs?

caddy is written in Go and goshs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or goshs?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (76,201 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose goshs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.