head to head · open source
caddy vs go-emby2openlist
caddy has 78,660 GitHub stars, 5,232 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped yesterday. go-emby2openlist has 674 stars, 71 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. caddy leads on adoption by 11,571% (78,660 vs 674 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; go-emby2openlist is written in Go under GPL-3.0. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, go-emby2openlist 11%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| caddy | go-emby2openlist | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 79K | ★ 674 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 71 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick caddy if
- You weight community size — 79K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick go-emby2openlist if
- You want the go-emby2openlist feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and go-emby2openlist fits your workflow better
About caddy
a project Every site on HTTPS Caddy is an extensible server platform that uses TLS by default. Releases · Documentation · Get Help Powered by Special thanks to: Warp, built for coding with multiple AI agents Available for MacOS, Linux, & Windows Menu Features Install Build from source For development With version information and/or plugins Quick start Overview Full documentation Getting help About Features Easy configuration with the Caddyfile Powerful configuration with its native JSON config Dynamic configuration with the JSON API Config adapters if you don't like JSON Automatic HTTPS by default ZeroSSL and…
read the full caddy overview →
About go-emby2openlist
go emby2openlist Go 语言编写的 Emby + OpenList 网盘直链反向代理服务，深度适配阿里云盘转码播放。 小白必看 网盘直链反向代理 : 正常情况下，Emby 通过磁盘挂载的形式间接读取网盘资源，走的是服务器代理模式，看一个视频时数据链路是： 客户端 = Emby 源服务器 = 磁盘挂载服务 = OpenList = 网盘 客户端 客户端 = Emby 反代服务器 = Emby 源服务器 （请求 Emby Api 接口） 客户端 客户端 = Emby 反代服务器 = OpenList = 网盘 （请求视频直链） 客户端 客户端 = 网盘（客户端拿着网盘的直链直接观看，此时已经没有服务器的事情了，故不会再消耗服务器流量） 这种方式的好处： 1. 观看时加载速度拉满（前提是有网盘会员） 2. 在客户端处解码，能不能看 4K 取决于你电视盒子的性能 使用前须知 1. 本项目初衷: 易用轻巧、小白友好、深度适配阿里云盘 (如果你使用本项目观看其他网盘时出现问题，也欢迎到 issue 区反馈，我会尽量适配它) 2. 如果你有更复杂的需求, 推荐使用功能更完善的反向代理服务：bpking1/embyExternalUrl 功能 OpenList 网盘原画直链播放 Strm 直链播放 OpenList 本地目录树生成 自定义注入 js/css（web） OpenList 网盘转码直链播放（阿里云盘）…
read the full go-emby2openlist overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is caddy or go-emby2openlist more popular?
caddy has 78,660 GitHub stars and go-emby2openlist has 674. caddy has the larger community by that measure.
Are caddy and go-emby2openlist free?
Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and go-emby2openlist under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between caddy and go-emby2openlist?
caddy is written in Go and go-emby2openlist in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, caddy or go-emby2openlist?
Choose caddy if you want the larger community (78,660 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose go-emby2openlist if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.