head to head · open source

caddy vs FreeDomain

caddy has 77,650 GitHub stars, 5,107 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FreeDomain has 2,258 stars, 31 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. caddy leads on adoption by 3,339% (77,650 vs 2,258 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; FreeDomain is written in various languages under MIT. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, FreeDomain 1%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 78K FreeDomain ★ 2.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy FreeDomain
GitHub stars ★ 78K ★ 2.3K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go —
Last push 2026-10-09 2026-10-09
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 78K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick FreeDomain if

  • You want the FreeDomain feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • You evaluated both and FreeDomain fits your workflow better

full FreeDomain profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About FreeDomain

FreeDomain, also called Intent, is a non profit service that hands developers and creators permanent, free subdomains under shared parent domains such as .int.yt .

read the full FreeDomain overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy caddy vs traefik frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs goproxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs cloudflared caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or FreeDomain more popular?

caddy has 77,650 GitHub stars and FreeDomain has 2,258. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and FreeDomain free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FreeDomain under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and FreeDomain?

caddy is written in Go and FreeDomain in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or FreeDomain?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (77,650 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose FreeDomain if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.