head to head · open source

caddy vs DnsServer

caddy has 75,847 GitHub stars, 4,970 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. DnsServer has 9,921 stars, 785 forks, 187 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. caddy leads on adoption by 665% (75,847 vs 9,921 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; DnsServer is written in C# under GPL-3.0. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, DnsServer 8%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (privacy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K DnsServer ★ 9.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy DnsServer
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 9.9K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 785
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick DnsServer if

  • You want the DnsServer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and DnsServer fits your workflow better

full DnsServer profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About DnsServer

Technitium DNS Server is an open source, cross platform authoritative and recursive DNS server written in C under GPL 3.0, aimed at anyone who wants to self host DNS resolution for privacy and security — a home network on a Raspberry Pi, or an organisation that needs encrypted DNS, network wide block lists, and centralised management.

read the full DnsServer overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns caddy vs SoftEtherVPN caddy vs sliver

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or DnsServer more popular?

caddy has 75,847 GitHub stars and DnsServer has 9,921. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and DnsServer free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and DnsServer under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and DnsServer?

caddy is written in Go and DnsServer in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or DnsServer?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (75,847 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose DnsServer if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.