head to head · open source

caddy vs DnsClient.NET

caddy has 76,244 GitHub stars, 5,026 forks, 286 open issues and last shipped today. DnsClient.NET has 880 stars, 149 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. caddy leads on adoption by 8,564% (76,244 vs 880 stars). caddy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; DnsClient.NET is written in C# under Apache-2.0. caddy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, DnsClient.NET 17%. caddy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

caddy ★ 76K DnsClient.NET ★ 880 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

caddy DnsClient.NET
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 880
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-10-03 2026-03-01
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 149
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick caddy if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full caddy profile →

pick DnsClient.NET if

  • You want the DnsClient.NET feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and DnsClient.NET fits your workflow better

full DnsClient.NET profile →

About caddy

Caddy is a Go based, Apache 2.0 licensed HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, and HTTP/3 web server and reverse proxy that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically by default, built for operators and teams who want every site on HTTPS without maintaining a separate certificate workflow.

read the full caddy overview →

About DnsClient.NET

DnsClient.NET is a high performance open source DNS lookup library for .NET developers who need to query DNS records programmatically from C applications.

read the full DnsClient.NET overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy caddy vs traefik frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

caddy vs frp caddy vs traefik caddy vs AdGuardHome caddy vs nginx caddy vs algo caddy vs nginx-proxy caddy vs goproxy caddy vs openvpn-install caddy vs cloudflared caddy vs amnezia-client caddy vs OpenVPN caddy vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is caddy or DnsClient.NET more popular?

caddy has 76,244 GitHub stars and DnsClient.NET has 880. caddy has the larger community by that measure.

Are caddy and DnsClient.NET free?

Both are open source. caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and DnsClient.NET under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between caddy and DnsClient.NET?

caddy is written in Go and DnsClient.NET in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, caddy or DnsClient.NET?

Choose caddy if you want the larger community (76,244 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose DnsClient.NET if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.