head to head · open source

AppSmith vs Budibase

AppSmith has 40,894 GitHub stars, 4,761 forks, 4,467 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Budibase has 28,289 stars, 2,218 forks, 276 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AppSmith leads on adoption by 45% (40,894 vs 28,289 stars). AppSmith is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Budibase is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. AppSmith has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Budibase 8%. AppSmith was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (internal-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AppSmith ★ 41K Budibase ★ 28K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

AppSmith Budibase
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 28K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 2.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AppSmith if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AppSmith profile →

pick Budibase if

  • You want the Budibase feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Budibase fits your workflow better

full Budibase profile →

About AppSmith

Appsmith is an open source, Apache 2.0 low code platform written primarily in TypeScript that lets teams build custom internal tools such as admin panels, dashboards, and CRUD applications on top of their own databases and APIs.

read the full AppSmith overview →

About Budibase

Budibase is an open source low code platform for building internal tools, data apps, and AI powered agents that automate operational workflows. It lives in the low code/no code ecosystem and serves as a self hostable alternative to proprietary platforms like Retool.

read the full Budibase overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

langflow vs appsmith langflow vs budibase langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

AppSmith vs Langflow AppSmith vs Supabase AppSmith vs PocketBase AppSmith vs ToolJet AppSmith vs TipTap AppSmith vs Directus AppSmith vs Onlook AppSmith vs Teable AppSmith vs Convex AppSmith vs Alokai AppSmith vs KeystoneJS AppSmith vs HeyForm

Frequently asked questions

Is AppSmith or Budibase more popular?

AppSmith has 40,894 GitHub stars and Budibase has 28,289. AppSmith has the larger community by that measure.

Are AppSmith and Budibase free?

Both are open source. AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Budibase has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between AppSmith and Budibase?

AppSmith is written in TypeScript and Budibase in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AppSmith or Budibase?

Choose AppSmith if you want the larger community (40,894 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Budibase if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.