head to head · open source

OpenCode vs Continue

OpenCode has 208,150 GitHub stars, 27,350 forks, 5,727 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Continue has 35,946 stars, 5,395 forks, 951 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. OpenCode leads on adoption by 479% (208,150 vs 35,946 stars). OpenCode is written in TypeScript under MIT; Continue is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. OpenCode has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Continue 15%. OpenCode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCode ★ 208K Continue ★ 36K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCode Continue
GitHub stars ★ 208K ★ 36K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 27K ⑂ 5.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCode if

  • You weight community size — 208K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCode profile →

pick Continue if

  • You want the Continue feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Continue fits your workflow better

full Continue profile →

About OpenCode

OpenCode is an open source AI coding agent designed to operate across terminal, IDE, and desktop environments. It integrates directly into developer workflows to assist with writing, editing, and understanding code using natural language prompts. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it runs locally or via a desktop app and supports multiple languages and platforms.

read the full OpenCode overview →

About Continue

Continue is an open source coding agent designed to assist developers directly within their IDE or terminal. It operates as a CLI tool, VS Code extension, and JetBrains plugin, enabling natural language interaction with codebases to generate, edit, and explain code. The project lives in the AI assisted developer tools ecosystem and is built with TypeScript under the Apache 2.0 license.

read the full Continue overview →

More in Developer Tools

Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit opencode vs nango opencode vs jitsu opencode vs aci-dev opencode vs convertigo opencode vs orbital opencode vs hercules opencode vs argos langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

OpenCode vs pi OpenCode vs OpenHands OpenCode vs Paperclip OpenCode vs Orca OpenCode vs Cline OpenCode vs Aider OpenCode vs Tabby OpenCode vs Grok Build OpenCode vs T3 Code OpenCode vs Dyad OpenCode vs SWE-agent OpenCode vs Paseo

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCode or Continue more popular?

OpenCode has 208,150 GitHub stars and Continue has 35,946. OpenCode has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCode and Continue free?

Both are open source. OpenCode is licensed under MIT and Continue under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCode and Continue?

OpenCode is written in TypeScript and Continue in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCode or Continue?

Choose OpenCode if you want the larger community (208,150 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Continue if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.