head to head · open source

PocketBase vs AppSmith

PocketBase has 61,070 GitHub stars, 3,688 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. AppSmith has 40,894 stars, 4,761 forks, 4,467 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PocketBase leads on adoption by 49% (61,070 vs 40,894 stars). PocketBase is written in Go under MIT; AppSmith is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. PocketBase has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, AppSmith 12%. AppSmith was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PocketBase ★ 61K AppSmith ★ 41K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

PocketBase AppSmith
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 41K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 4.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PocketBase if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PocketBase profile →

pick AppSmith if

  • You want the AppSmith feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and AppSmith fits your workflow better

full AppSmith profile →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

About AppSmith

Appsmith is an open source, Apache 2.0 low code platform written primarily in TypeScript that lets teams build custom internal tools such as admin panels, dashboards, and CRUD applications on top of their own databases and APIs.

read the full AppSmith overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs appsmith langflow vs supabase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

PocketBase vs Langflow PocketBase vs Supabase PocketBase vs ToolJet PocketBase vs TipTap PocketBase vs Directus PocketBase vs Budibase PocketBase vs Onlook PocketBase vs Teable PocketBase vs Convex PocketBase vs Alokai PocketBase vs KeystoneJS PocketBase vs HeyForm

Frequently asked questions

Is PocketBase or AppSmith more popular?

PocketBase has 61,070 GitHub stars and AppSmith has 40,894. PocketBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are PocketBase and AppSmith free?

Both are open source. PocketBase is licensed under MIT and AppSmith under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PocketBase and AppSmith?

PocketBase is written in Go and AppSmith in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PocketBase or AppSmith?

Choose PocketBase if you want the larger community (61,070 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose AppSmith if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.