head to head · open source

AppSmith vs HeyForm

AppSmith has 40,894 GitHub stars, 4,761 forks, 4,467 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HeyForm has 8,977 stars, 708 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. AppSmith leads on adoption by 356% (40,894 vs 8,977 stars). AppSmith is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; HeyForm is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. AppSmith has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, HeyForm 8%. AppSmith was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AppSmith ★ 41K HeyForm ★ 9.0K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

AppSmith HeyForm
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 9.0K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 708
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AppSmith if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AppSmith profile →

pick HeyForm if

  • You want the HeyForm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and HeyForm fits your workflow better

full HeyForm profile →

About AppSmith

Appsmith is an open source, Apache 2.0 low code platform written primarily in TypeScript that lets teams build custom internal tools such as admin panels, dashboards, and CRUD applications on top of their own databases and APIs.

read the full AppSmith overview →

About HeyForm

HeyForm is an open source form builder written in TypeScript and released under the GNU Affero General Public License v3.0. It lives in the JavaScript and TypeScript ecosystem, and its repository is organised as a monorepo of packages: a Node server, a React webapp, a form renderer, an embeddable JavaScript library, and shared utilities and type definitions used by both the server and the webapp. The project describes itself as an open source form builder built for small business success, and it is positioned as an open alternative to Typeform.

read the full HeyForm overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

langflow vs appsmith langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

AppSmith vs Langflow AppSmith vs Supabase AppSmith vs PocketBase AppSmith vs ToolJet AppSmith vs TipTap AppSmith vs Directus AppSmith vs Budibase AppSmith vs Onlook AppSmith vs Teable AppSmith vs Convex AppSmith vs Alokai AppSmith vs KeystoneJS

Frequently asked questions

Is AppSmith or HeyForm more popular?

AppSmith has 40,894 GitHub stars and HeyForm has 8,977. AppSmith has the larger community by that measure.

Are AppSmith and HeyForm free?

Both are open source. AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0 and HeyForm under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AppSmith and HeyForm?

AppSmith is written in TypeScript and HeyForm in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AppSmith or HeyForm?

Choose AppSmith if you want the larger community (40,894 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose HeyForm if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.