head to head · open source

OpenCode vs Kilo

OpenCode has 208,150 GitHub stars, 27,350 forks, 5,727 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Kilo has 27,341 stars, 3,165 forks, 586 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCode leads on adoption by 661% (208,150 vs 27,341 stars). OpenCode is written in TypeScript under MIT; Kilo is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenCode has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Kilo 12%. Kilo was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCode ★ 208K Kilo ★ 27K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCode Kilo
GitHub stars ★ 208K ★ 27K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 27K ⑂ 3.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCode if

  • You weight community size — 208K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCode profile →

pick Kilo if

  • You want the Kilo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Kilo fits your workflow better

full Kilo profile →

About OpenCode

OpenCode is an open source AI coding agent designed to operate across terminal, IDE, and desktop environments. It integrates directly into developer workflows to assist with writing, editing, and understanding code using natural language prompts. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it runs locally or via a desktop app and supports multiple languages and platforms.

read the full OpenCode overview →

About Kilo

Kilo is an open source AI coding agent platform that integrates into VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, the CLI, and cloud environments. It enables developers to build, ship, and iterate faster by acting as an autonomous or semi autonomous coding assistant across their entire workflow. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it supports 500+ models—including GPT 5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Sonnet 4.6, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview—without vendor lock in or markup.

read the full Kilo overview →

More in Developer Tools

Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed opencode vs codeedit langflow vs kilocode opencode vs nango opencode vs jitsu opencode vs aci-dev opencode vs convertigo opencode vs orbital opencode vs hercules opencode vs argos langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed neovim vs zed langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

OpenCode vs pi OpenCode vs OpenHands OpenCode vs Paperclip OpenCode vs Orca OpenCode vs Cline OpenCode vs Aider OpenCode vs Continue OpenCode vs Tabby OpenCode vs Grok Build OpenCode vs T3 Code OpenCode vs Dyad OpenCode vs SWE-agent

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCode or Kilo more popular?

OpenCode has 208,150 GitHub stars and Kilo has 27,341. OpenCode has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCode and Kilo free?

Both are open source. OpenCode is licensed under MIT and Kilo under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCode and Kilo?

OpenCode is written in TypeScript and Kilo in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCode or Kilo?

Choose OpenCode if you want the larger community (208,150 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Kilo if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.