head to head · open source

AppSmith vs KeystoneJS

AppSmith has 40,894 GitHub stars, 4,761 forks, 4,467 open issues and last shipped yesterday. KeystoneJS has 9,974 stars, 1,263 forks, 138 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. AppSmith leads on adoption by 310% (40,894 vs 9,974 stars). AppSmith is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; KeystoneJS is written in TypeScript under MIT. AppSmith has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, KeystoneJS 13%. AppSmith was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

AppSmith ★ 41K KeystoneJS ★ 10.0K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

AppSmith KeystoneJS
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 10.0K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick AppSmith if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full AppSmith profile →

pick KeystoneJS if

  • You want the KeystoneJS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and KeystoneJS fits your workflow better

full KeystoneJS profile →

About AppSmith

Appsmith is an open source, Apache 2.0 low code platform written primarily in TypeScript that lets teams build custom internal tools such as admin panels, dashboards, and CRUD applications on top of their own databases and APIs.

read the full AppSmith overview →

About KeystoneJS

KeystoneJS is an open source Node.js CMS and application framework written in TypeScript and licensed under the MIT License. It lives in the Node.js, GraphQL, and React ecosystem, and its GitHub description calls it a headless CMS for Node.js. The project addresses the need to build a custom back end without writing all of the common content management plumbing by hand.

read the full KeystoneJS overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

langflow vs appsmith langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

AppSmith vs Langflow AppSmith vs Supabase AppSmith vs PocketBase AppSmith vs ToolJet AppSmith vs TipTap AppSmith vs Directus AppSmith vs Budibase AppSmith vs Onlook AppSmith vs Teable AppSmith vs Convex AppSmith vs Alokai AppSmith vs HeyForm

Frequently asked questions

Is AppSmith or KeystoneJS more popular?

AppSmith has 40,894 GitHub stars and KeystoneJS has 9,974. AppSmith has the larger community by that measure.

Are AppSmith and KeystoneJS free?

Both are open source. AppSmith is licensed under Apache-2.0 and KeystoneJS under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between AppSmith and KeystoneJS?

AppSmith is written in TypeScript and KeystoneJS in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, AppSmith or KeystoneJS?

Choose AppSmith if you want the larger community (40,894 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose KeystoneJS if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.