head to head · open source

ECC vs bb

ECC has 267,866 GitHub stars, 40,036 forks, 239 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. bb has 3,946 stars, 553 forks, 463 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 6,688% (267,866 vs 3,946 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; bb is written in TypeScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, bb 14%. bb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (claude-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 268K bb ★ 3.9K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC bb
GitHub stars ★ 268K ★ 3.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-26
Forks ⑂ 40K ⑂ 553
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 268K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick bb if

  • You want the bb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and bb fits your workflow better

full bb profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About bb

bb is the agent IDE that builds itself: an MIT licensed TypeScript application that lets developers drive coding agents from a desktop app, a web app, a CLI, or an HTTP API, and extend the tool itself while it runs.

read the full bb overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 210K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K pi ★ 110K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs herdr ECC vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or bb more popular?

ECC has 267,866 GitHub stars and bb has 3,946. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and bb free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and bb under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and bb?

ECC is written in JavaScript and bb in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or bb?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (267,866 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bb if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.