head to head · open source

anime vs taroify

anime has 73,360 GitHub stars, 4,957 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. taroify has 1,098 stars, 120 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. anime leads on adoption by 6,581% (73,360 vs 1,098 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; taroify is written in TypeScript under MIT. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, taroify 11%. taroify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K taroify ★ 1.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime taroify
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 1.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-10-03
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 120
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick taroify if

  • You want the taroify feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and taroify fits your workflow better

full taroify profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About taroify

Taroify is a React mobile component library for the Taro framework that gives developers a Vant compatible UI toolkit for building mini programs and H5 applications.

read the full taroify overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs ant-design anime vs open-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs motion anime vs layui anime vs lottie-ios anime vs vant anime vs primitives anime vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or taroify more popular?

anime has 73,360 GitHub stars and taroify has 1,098. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and taroify free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and taroify under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and taroify?

anime is written in JavaScript and taroify in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or taroify?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (73,360 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose taroify if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.