head to head · open source

anime vs tailwindcss-motion

anime has 73,410 GitHub stars, 4,959 forks, 118 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. tailwindcss-motion has 3,324 stars, 38 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. anime leads on adoption by 2,108% (73,410 vs 3,324 stars). anime is written in JavaScript under MIT; tailwindcss-motion is written in TypeScript under MIT. anime has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, tailwindcss-motion 1%. anime was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (animation, css), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

anime ★ 73K tailwindcss-motion ★ 3.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

anime tailwindcss-motion
GitHub stars ★ 73K ★ 3.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-21 2026-02-12
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 38
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick anime if

  • You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full anime profile →

pick tailwindcss-motion if

  • You want the tailwindcss-motion feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and tailwindcss-motion fits your workflow better

full tailwindcss-motion profile →

About anime

Anime.js is a free, MIT licensed JavaScript animation engine for developers who need to animate CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes, and plain JavaScript objects from a single lightweight API.

read the full anime overview →

About tailwindcss-motion

tailwindcss motion is an MIT licensed Tailwind CSS plugin for adding animation to web projects through utility classes, aimed at developers and designers already working in the Tailwind ecosystem.

read the full tailwindcss-motion overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 190K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 100K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

anime vs open-design anime vs ant-design anime vs manim anime vs hyperframes anime vs daisyui anime vs tabler anime vs motion anime vs layui anime vs lottie-ios anime vs vant anime vs primitives anime vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is anime or tailwindcss-motion more popular?

anime has 73,410 GitHub stars and tailwindcss-motion has 3,324. anime has the larger community by that measure.

Are anime and tailwindcss-motion free?

Both are open source. anime is licensed under MIT and tailwindcss-motion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between anime and tailwindcss-motion?

anime is written in JavaScript and tailwindcss-motion in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, anime or tailwindcss-motion?

Choose anime if you want the larger community (73,410 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose tailwindcss-motion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.